Coffee with Coker
Episode 53: Physician Compensation Methodologies under the Stark Law
- December 19, 2019
Anna Grizzle joins Mark to discuss the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit False Claims Act (FCA) decision calling into question productivity-based physician compensation structures under the Stark Law. Mark interviews Anna to hear her perspective on the U.S. ex rel. Bookwalter v. UPMC and the Third Circuit’s decision.
Contact Information
Subscribe to our feed in Apple Podcasts, Google Podcasts, Spotify, or your preferred podcast provider. Like what you hear? Leave a review! Not there? Let us know!
We welcome all feedback from our listeners. Please submit questions on any of the topics we discuss or about issues that interest you. You can also recommend topics for future episodes.
- Email us: [email protected]
- Connect with us on LinkedIn: Coker Group Company Page
- Follow us on Twitter: @cokergroup
- Follow us on Instagram: @cokergroup
Episode Synopsis
The case involved employment arrangements between the medical center’s subsidiary physician practice entities and neurosurgeons who performed procedures at affiliated hospitals. The Third Circuit’s decision appears to call into question a common compensation methodology for physician professional services.
Continue reading: Inside the FCA: Third Circuit Holds Allegations of Improper Compensation Methodologies under the Stark Law Survive Motion to Dismiss
Extras
