Coffee with Coker

Episode 53: Physician Compensation Methodologies under the Stark Law

  • December 19, 2019
[iframe style=”border:none” src=”//html5-player.libsyn.com/embed/episode/id/12451847/height/100/width//thumbnail/yes/render-playlist/no/theme/custom/tdest_id/1164482/custom-color/0067b1″ height=”100″ width=”100%” scrolling=”no” allowfullscreen webkitallowfullscreen mozallowfullscreen oallowfullscreen msallowfullscreen]

Anna Grizzle joins Mark to discuss the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit False Claims Act (FCA) decision calling into question productivity-based physician compensation structures under the Stark Law. Mark interviews Anna to hear her perspective on the U.S. ex rel. Bookwalter v. UPMC and the Third Circuit’s decision.

Contact Information

Subscribe to our feed in Apple Podcasts, Google Podcasts, Spotify, or your preferred podcast provider. Like what you hear? Leave a review! Not there? Let us know!

We welcome all feedback from our listeners. Please submit questions on any of the topics we discuss or about issues that interest you. You can also recommend topics for future episodes.

Episode Synopsis

The case involved employment arrangements between the medical center’s subsidiary physician practice entities and neurosurgeons who performed procedures at affiliated hospitals. The Third Circuit’s decision appears to call into question a common compensation methodology for physician professional services.

Continue reading: Inside the FCA: Third Circuit Holds Allegations of Improper Compensation Methodologies under the Stark Law Survive Motion to Dismiss

Extras

Bio: Anna Grizzle

 

Join our email list!

Please subscribe for new updates


Contact us today for more information about our healthcare consulting services and learn how we can help your organization.

Contact Us